<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reading and Learning in an Attention Economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://edinsanity.com/2008/06/17/reading-and-learning-in-an-attention-economy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://edinsanity.com/2008/06/17/reading-and-learning-in-an-attention-economy/</link>
	<description>“Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”  Albert Einstein</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:19:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tina K.</title>
		<link>http://edinsanity.com/2008/06/17/reading-and-learning-in-an-attention-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-645</link>
		<dc:creator>Tina K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edinsanity.com/?p=126#comment-645</guid>
		<description>Jon,
Read the above &#039;romanticism -of-books&#039; Good reading also.  
I do not think that Google is making us stupid, and I do think books are better in certain situations.  I like to use my computer for certain reading and informational tasks.  I like to read a book for types of reading and information.  Let the reading situation denote the reading aparatus.  I do think young children enjoy a book for tactile reasons, and that might be linked to the person helping them read enjoying the book also.  I like to think that a book is to reading as a beginning artist is to oil and canvas.  Later the artist develops the need to go to computers as a medium but starting with the oil and canvas holds a worth while experience, and will always continue to be so. Hope we always have the choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon,<br />
Read the above &#8216;romanticism -of-books&#8217; Good reading also.<br />
I do not think that Google is making us stupid, and I do think books are better in certain situations.  I like to use my computer for certain reading and informational tasks.  I like to read a book for types of reading and information.  Let the reading situation denote the reading aparatus.  I do think young children enjoy a book for tactile reasons, and that might be linked to the person helping them read enjoying the book also.  I like to think that a book is to reading as a beginning artist is to oil and canvas.  Later the artist develops the need to go to computers as a medium but starting with the oil and canvas holds a worth while experience, and will always continue to be so. Hope we always have the choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Becker</title>
		<link>http://edinsanity.com/2008/06/17/reading-and-learning-in-an-attention-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-636</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Becker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 03:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edinsanity.com/?p=126#comment-636</guid>
		<description>Tina, interesting comment, especially in light of a post by John Hendron on his blog here: http://www.johnhendron.net/digest/2008/06/17/on-the-romanticism-of-books/

I&#039;m more in agreement with John.  I don&#039;t think Google is making us stupid or that books are better.  I think things are changing and we may need to break up with books and cite irreconcilable differences.  (-:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tina, interesting comment, especially in light of a post by John Hendron on his blog here: <a href="http://www.johnhendron.net/digest/2008/06/17/on-the-romanticism-of-books/" rel="nofollow">http://www.johnhendron.net/digest/2008/06/17/on-the-romanticism-of-books/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m more in agreement with John.  I don&#8217;t think Google is making us stupid or that books are better.  I think things are changing and we may need to break up with books and cite irreconcilable differences.  (-:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tina K.</title>
		<link>http://edinsanity.com/2008/06/17/reading-and-learning-in-an-attention-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-635</link>
		<dc:creator>Tina K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 03:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edinsanity.com/?p=126#comment-635</guid>
		<description>Justin,
Good article to read, had to make sure I did not skip through it.  I have started to read (books)less and blog more. The more I blog the less time I have to read.  What a circle.  I also notice that reading a book is comfortable and engaging.  When I read on line it does not have the same sensation.  I can not feel the pages as they are turned, the smell of paper, the thickness of the volume, the book held at various angles.  I did not realize what those senses while reading meant in engaging me to devour the book.  
I do see myself involved in attention economy.  Need to pick up more books now that I am more aware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin,<br />
Good article to read, had to make sure I did not skip through it.  I have started to read (books)less and blog more. The more I blog the less time I have to read.  What a circle.  I also notice that reading a book is comfortable and engaging.  When I read on line it does not have the same sensation.  I can not feel the pages as they are turned, the smell of paper, the thickness of the volume, the book held at various angles.  I did not realize what those senses while reading meant in engaging me to devour the book.<br />
I do see myself involved in attention economy.  Need to pick up more books now that I am more aware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Becker</title>
		<link>http://edinsanity.com/2008/06/17/reading-and-learning-in-an-attention-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-628</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Becker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edinsanity.com/?p=126#comment-628</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m only halfway through the book, Justin, so when I&#039;m done I&#039;ll give you the Cliffs Notes version.  But, for now, just know that &quot;Everything is Metadata&quot; would have been just as good a title.  I also haven&#039;t seen any discussion about how all of this &quot;DISorder&quot; is possible because of the power of (relational) databases.  Maybe I&#039;ll get there...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m only halfway through the book, Justin, so when I&#8217;m done I&#8217;ll give you the Cliffs Notes version.  But, for now, just know that &#8220;Everything is Metadata&#8221; would have been just as good a title.  I also haven&#8217;t seen any discussion about how all of this &#8220;DISorder&#8221; is possible because of the power of (relational) databases.  Maybe I&#8217;ll get there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin B.</title>
		<link>http://edinsanity.com/2008/06/17/reading-and-learning-in-an-attention-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-622</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edinsanity.com/?p=126#comment-622</guid>
		<description>Could you write those 15 pages and save me the trouble of reading it? It is also on my list sometime down the line and I would much prefer not to know about the history of UPCs. 

Have you seen &quot;Is Google Making us Stupid?&quot; in this month&#039;s Atlantic? Here is the link: http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200807/google - It sort of relates to what you are talking about here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you write those 15 pages and save me the trouble of reading it? It is also on my list sometime down the line and I would much prefer not to know about the history of UPCs. </p>
<p>Have you seen &#8220;Is Google Making us Stupid?&#8221; in this month&#8217;s Atlantic? Here is the link: <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200807/google" rel="nofollow">http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200807/google</a> &#8211; It sort of relates to what you are talking about here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
