<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And now back to our regularly scheduled program&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://edinsanity.com/2008/08/21/and-now-back-to-our-regularly-scheduled-program/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://edinsanity.com/2008/08/21/and-now-back-to-our-regularly-scheduled-program/</link>
	<description>“Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”  Albert Einstein</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 08:37:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon Becker</title>
		<link>http://edinsanity.com/2008/08/21/and-now-back-to-our-regularly-scheduled-program/comment-page-1/#comment-1164</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Becker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 03:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edinsanity.com/?p=190#comment-1164</guid>
		<description>@Justin - I gave the blog a whole paragraph out of 40 pages in the narrative, so I don&#039;t even know if anyone will comment on it.  I wasn&#039;t going to be too radical about it.  We&#039;ll see, though. I know my dept. chair buys my argument, so I have that going for me.

@Betsy - rock on! I worry that you&#039;ll hit some opposition.  My experiences in Hanover have been that just about everything is blocked.  I&#039;d check with your district tech. folks.  But, I would go to them with a definite plan.  I&#039;ve been tinkering with some of the same issues you are; how to add an electronic community as a supplement to a f-2-f community.  I&#039;ve reached the same conclusion as you about Blackboard; it sucks.  Ning is pretty good, but I&#039;m not loving it.  Lately, I&#039;ve been leaning toward Wetpaint. It&#039;s basically a wiki system, but it has a really nice discussion forum system built into it.  And, for educators, Wetpaint will remove the ads if you ask.  I&#039;d be MORE than happy to discuss this further with you.  If you&#039;re interested, send me an e-mail and we can either chat by phone or sit down f-2-f to discuss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Justin &#8211; I gave the blog a whole paragraph out of 40 pages in the narrative, so I don&#8217;t even know if anyone will comment on it.  I wasn&#8217;t going to be too radical about it.  We&#8217;ll see, though. I know my dept. chair buys my argument, so I have that going for me.</p>
<p>@Betsy &#8211; rock on! I worry that you&#8217;ll hit some opposition.  My experiences in Hanover have been that just about everything is blocked.  I&#8217;d check with your district tech. folks.  But, I would go to them with a definite plan.  I&#8217;ve been tinkering with some of the same issues you are; how to add an electronic community as a supplement to a f-2-f community.  I&#8217;ve reached the same conclusion as you about Blackboard; it sucks.  Ning is pretty good, but I&#8217;m not loving it.  Lately, I&#8217;ve been leaning toward Wetpaint. It&#8217;s basically a wiki system, but it has a really nice discussion forum system built into it.  And, for educators, Wetpaint will remove the ads if you ask.  I&#8217;d be MORE than happy to discuss this further with you.  If you&#8217;re interested, send me an e-mail and we can either chat by phone or sit down f-2-f to discuss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betsy</title>
		<link>http://edinsanity.com/2008/08/21/and-now-back-to-our-regularly-scheduled-program/comment-page-1/#comment-1162</link>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 23:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edinsanity.com/?p=190#comment-1162</guid>
		<description>Glad to see you back! People ARE reading this, you know! I am readying myself for the school year and have been wondering how to approach some technology issues. One, I would love to have a Facebook group for my leadership students for discussion/planning (Blackboard is SO BAD) but I don&#039;t want to see their profiles, even though I wouldn&#039;t care if they saw mine.(These are seniors in high school.) Also, I would love to have my own student leadership blog where the same planning/discussion would take place, but I think there is no policy on this. Would a NING group be better suited? I have no experience on that. What to do? I&#039;m a woman with big dreams and no guiding policy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see you back! People ARE reading this, you know! I am readying myself for the school year and have been wondering how to approach some technology issues. One, I would love to have a Facebook group for my leadership students for discussion/planning (Blackboard is SO BAD) but I don&#8217;t want to see their profiles, even though I wouldn&#8217;t care if they saw mine.(These are seniors in high school.) Also, I would love to have my own student leadership blog where the same planning/discussion would take place, but I think there is no policy on this. Would a NING group be better suited? I have no experience on that. What to do? I&#8217;m a woman with big dreams and no guiding policy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin B.</title>
		<link>http://edinsanity.com/2008/08/21/and-now-back-to-our-regularly-scheduled-program/comment-page-1/#comment-1161</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edinsanity.com/?p=190#comment-1161</guid>
		<description>I will be interested to see what they say about the blogging in the tenure review, especially given your defense of it. I hope they give it at least some value as a publication instead of just value as service. 

It would actually be an interesting and valuable study. I know it won&#039;t help you much, but a peer-reviewed article on a study of the increasing value of blogging in tenure review would really go a long way to help us edubloggers that happen to be professors. If there was only like 29 hours in the day instead, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will be interested to see what they say about the blogging in the tenure review, especially given your defense of it. I hope they give it at least some value as a publication instead of just value as service. </p>
<p>It would actually be an interesting and valuable study. I know it won&#8217;t help you much, but a peer-reviewed article on a study of the increasing value of blogging in tenure review would really go a long way to help us edubloggers that happen to be professors. If there was only like 29 hours in the day instead, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
