<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NECC &#8217;09 Reflections: What Just Happened?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://edinsanity.com/2009/07/10/necc-09-reflections-what-just-happened/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://edinsanity.com/2009/07/10/necc-09-reflections-what-just-happened/</link>
	<description>“Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”  Albert Einstein</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:19:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Jones</title>
		<link>http://edinsanity.com/2009/07/10/necc-09-reflections-what-just-happened/comment-page-1/#comment-2016</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edinsanity.com/?p=357#comment-2016</guid>
		<description>Jon, great observations. just one problem:

Bringing Leadership to education is a problem of culture. We can&#039;t change that by changing a few conferences. We can talk about it, but the legal  structure impedes any real change.

The problem is encapsulated in the title of your next post: Politics Education. 

Until we create a structure where professionalism trumps politics with the state and national teachers organizations, we&#039;re doomed. Leadership (technical, pedagogical, or personal) will be trumped by partisan politics. When education &quot;leaders&quot; spend their time doing partisan politics, while education lives in one-party rule; while 85% of teachers side with the left wing of the country, we can&#039;t focus on leadership and building first class organizations.

Don&#039;t talk to NECC about this issue. Talk to legislators who mandate collective bargaining.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon, great observations. just one problem:</p>
<p>Bringing Leadership to education is a problem of culture. We can&#8217;t change that by changing a few conferences. We can talk about it, but the legal  structure impedes any real change.</p>
<p>The problem is encapsulated in the title of your next post: Politics Education. </p>
<p>Until we create a structure where professionalism trumps politics with the state and national teachers organizations, we&#8217;re doomed. Leadership (technical, pedagogical, or personal) will be trumped by partisan politics. When education &#8220;leaders&#8221; spend their time doing partisan politics, while education lives in one-party rule; while 85% of teachers side with the left wing of the country, we can&#8217;t focus on leadership and building first class organizations.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t talk to NECC about this issue. Talk to legislators who mandate collective bargaining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://edinsanity.com/2009/07/10/necc-09-reflections-what-just-happened/comment-page-1/#comment-2009</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edinsanity.com/?p=357#comment-2009</guid>
		<description>I actually had very similar thoughts after NECC09 but couldn&#039;t articulate them as well as you did. Not only were there limited sessions on leadership or policy, but interest is definitely more geared towards classroom practice. I went to sessions based on web 2.0 tools that attracted over 300 people compared to a session on the Nat&#039;l Ed Tech Plan which maybe 50 people attended. I guess it just confirms that most attendees are school or district level folks. I kept thinking that there were great sessions on integrating new, purposeful technology and yet it will probably only result in isolated/grass-roots led pockets of innovation across schools since there is no big picture thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually had very similar thoughts after NECC09 but couldn&#8217;t articulate them as well as you did. Not only were there limited sessions on leadership or policy, but interest is definitely more geared towards classroom practice. I went to sessions based on web 2.0 tools that attracted over 300 people compared to a session on the Nat&#8217;l Ed Tech Plan which maybe 50 people attended. I guess it just confirms that most attendees are school or district level folks. I kept thinking that there were great sessions on integrating new, purposeful technology and yet it will probably only result in isolated/grass-roots led pockets of innovation across schools since there is no big picture thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
