I’ll be standing for tenure this coming academic year. Part of that process includes an external review, but that only involves three other individuals and they have to be tenured faculty members at an institution of higher education. There are other limitations, too (e.g. the reviewer can’t be a co-author of any paper/book/report/etc.). This has always struck me as a rather narrow form of external review with a narrow construction of what a “peer” is. So, I’m soliciting feedback from you all (whoever that might be).
If you’d take a moment to complete the short form below, I’d appreciate it. My plan is to include these data somewhere on my ePortfolio in raw and summary form.
Thanks for your consideration.