[NOTE #1: this was originally posted on February 7, 2008. I am re-posting it here as part of the #edublogBT idea/meme about which I wrote yesterday.] [NOTE #2: at the time, I had designs on posting a weekly blog post about educational research. I think I got as far 4 or 5 entries before that [...]
Continue Reading »
Posted in Ed. Research, Ed. Tech. • 2 Comments »
[NOTE: this is the final post in a series of posts about a report recently issued based on a study done by Marzano Research Laboratory. Part I is here, Part II is here, Part III is here, and Part IV is here.] PART V: SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS [NOTE #2: I know, I know...I'm a couple [...]
Continue Reading »
Tags: evaluation, IWB, Marzano, peer-review, research
Posted in Ed. Research • 8 Comments »
[NOTE: this is the fourth in a series of posts about a report recently issued based on a study done by Marzano Research Laboratory. Part I is here, Part II is here, and Part III is here.] PART IV: INTERNAL VALIDITY “Internal Validity is the approximate truth about inferences regarding cause-effect or causal relationships” (Trochim, [...]
Continue Reading »
Tags: evaluation, IWB, Marzano, peer-review, research
Posted in Ed. Research • 4 Comments »
[NOTE: this is the third in a series of posts about a report recently issued based on a study done by Marzano Research Laboratory. Part I is here and Part II is here.] PART III: MEASUREMENT VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY As I wrote yesterday, Marzano and his research team had a “dependent variable problem.” That is, [...]
Continue Reading »
Tags: evaluation, IWB, Marzano, peer-review, research
Posted in Ed. Research • 5 Comments »
[NOTE: this is the second in a series of posts about a report recently issued based on a study done by Marzano Research Laboratory. Part I is here.] PART II: RESEARCH DESIGN ISSUES From a research design perspective, this study (or collection of studies?) is best described as unusual. In fact, what Marzano’s research team [...]
Continue Reading »
Tags: evaluation, IWB, Marzano, research
Posted in Ed. Research • 4 Comments »